ORI Logo ORI Logo Promoting Integrity in Research
Individual | Institutional
 
Home About ORI Privacy FOIA Sitemap Contact ORI
. Search ORI
.
.
.
. Sections
.
.
.Assurance
.Conferences
.Handling Misconduct
.International
.Policies / Regulations
.Publications
.RCR Education
.Research
.RIOs

.
. Newsletter
.
.
Latest Newsletter (PDF)
June 2008


Past Issues...

.
.
. Annual Report
.
.
ORI Annual Report 2006
PDF format

Annual Report
Past Reports...

.
. Graduate RCR
.
.
Graduate Education for RCR
Annual Report
New CGS publication identifies best practices in RCR
.

 
 

 
.
. International Menu
.
.
.Introduction
.Websites
.Activity
.Misconduct Cases

.
.

International - Activity

Germany, England Responding to Scientific Misconduct Cases

Volume 5, No. 4, September, 1997

Scientific misconduct cases in Germany and England are fueling efforts to develop research standards and establish policies and procedures for responding to allegations of misconduct in those countries.

The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), the main granting agency in Germany, has decided to establish an international commission composed of 7-10 prominent scientists to discuss research standards and scientific oversight procedures that may be adopted in Germany and internationally, according to Science. In addition, the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences, the premier scientific research organization in Germany, is developing new guidelines and procedures for detecting, assessing, and punishing research fraud, Science reports. The Max Planck Society has approximately 10,750 staff members, including about 2,750 scientists in 75 institutes and research facilities that are supported by the federal and state governments in Germany.

The German efforts were sparked by a major misconduct case that involved two investigations, three institutions, at least four published papers, and four investigative committees. One respondent has admitted fabricating the data; the other denies all charges. In another case last year, a German university withdrew the doctorate in chemistry that it had awarded to a researcher.

In England, the editors of nine prestigious British medical journals have formed a Committee on Publication Ethics to help each other deal with fraudulent papers submitted to their journals. One editor had four apparent misconduct cases in his first year. The editors will seek advice from the committee on how to handle alleged fraud cases. The committee may also draft guidelines on investigating complaints, promote research into publication ethics, and provide training in good practice, according to ScienceNow on the World Wide Web. In 1995, Nature reported that the Medical Research Council and the Royal College of Physicians were taking steps to combat scientific misconduct in medical research in England.


 
.
This page last was updated on January 10, 2005
.
Legal Disclaimer / Accessibility

Adobe Reader icon
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Research Integrity • 1101 Wootton Parkway • Suite 750 • Rockville, MD 20852
  Directions to ORI Office
Questions/suggestions about this web page? Contact ORI
. .